Have you ever had to credit or discount an invoice? If the answer is yes, then you have leakage. If the answer is no, then you definitely have leakage.

Warranty and contract leakage are much more common than you might think, and you have to look at the right KPIs to uncover the leakage present at your business. In this article, I will walk through how you can identify leakage and its impacts on your business and then course correct so you don’t leave money on the table.

1. Understand What Leakage Is

What is service leakage? In the simplest terminology: you are losing money. And the bad news is that it often happens without you knowing or realizing it.

We can distinguish two types of service leakage:

  1. Non-Contract leakage: the periods in the operational life cycle of an asset not covered by warranty and/or a service contract (sometimes this is also called T&M-leakage because service outside a contract classifies as T&M).
  2. Contract leakage: an asset is covered by warranty and/ or a service contract but in your service delivery you provide more and/or a higher level of service than the customer is entitled to.

Contract leakage typically occurs when service organizations do not know and/or manage expiration dates of warranty and contracts. Non-contract leakage typically occurs when the entitlement process is fragmented and/or when the information is not accessible to all involved service actors.

Let’s mention a couple of common scenarios:

  • A customer claims a defect within the warranty period. You correctly entitle the job as ‘warranty.’ On-site the technician detects ‘customer induced damage.’ The technician performs the repair anyhow and there is no charge to the customer.
  • A customer is entitled to next day service but presses you to fix the machine today without paying an additional fee. Because your technicians are not busy today, you give in to the request.
  • A customer makes a service request assuming the current contract is still active. Upon entitlement check, you detect it has expired three months ago. The customer agrees to renew the contract per the current date. You incur 3 months loss in contract revenue.
  • A customer has multiple machines of the same model. Only one of them is covered by a contract. The single contract line is used to entitle work on all of them because the customer always uses the same serial number.

Service leaks are not the problem; they are the symptom. They reveal a disconnect between process design and actual behavior. Denial of leakage increases the disconnect.

2. Identify the Impact of Leakage

One of the unfortunate things in business is that the cost always hits you. But if you are so good at capturing cost, why do you allow revenue to slip through your fingers? How do you think your shareholders would enjoy hearing that you worked on a customer’s asset and neglected to bill them?

Another way to look at the impact of leakage is to establish how much extra revenue would need to be found above and beyond what you are already billing for. As we have established, you capture all of your costs so any leakage (missed revenue) that you capture will have a 100% positive impact on your bottom line. That means every dollar billed will be a full dollar of equivalent gross margin.

Let’s say you were running at 20% margin as a service organization and you allowed $100,000 to leak through your service organization. You would need to go and find $500,000 of brand spanking new business to offset this $100,000 leakage just to break even. How hard is it for a business to find $500,000 of extra revenue with the same resources?

Actually, quite easy— if you set your system up to minimize the risk of leakage.

On top of the cost, revenue, and margin contribution impacts, customer expectation is a big one. Leakage has a very large behavioral component. If a customer is used to getting service for free, it becomes very difficult to start charging for it. If a customer discovers you can’t manage your entitlements correctly, this may lead to unwanted service calls.

A similar behavioral impact can be expected on the technician’s end. A technician chose his job because they wants to fix things and be a hero on site. A technician did not select the job to do admin and become a contract-referee. Thus, if you do not empower your technicians with the right tools and information and do not expect any cost/revenue sensitivity, they will go for CSAT and please the customer.

3. Set Up Your System to Find Leakage

Do you find leakage or is it a matter of capturing it? You are delivering all of the services that create the opportunity for leakage, so you already know where it is, you just need the correct tools to capture it. You need a robust process and a robust warranty and contract management solution to support that process and remove chance from the equation.

Detecting, quantifying, and finding the origin of leakage in your organization is a process like remedying a leaky roof. You’ll need adjacent instruments to find the source.

4. Remedy the Leakage

The first step towards remedying leakage is accepting its existence. Once you have made leakage visible, you can start actioning it. And in general, those actions fall into three categories:

1. Stop delivering free service. This has a direct cost reduction benefit.

2. Start charging for the free services you were delivering. This will increase both your revenue and your margin; the additional margin is 100% as we have shown you have already incurred the cost.

3. Continue delivering ‘free’ service and use it as collateral for something else of value. This benefit is harder to manage, but we can argue it is good for CSAT and can be used during contract renewal to counter cost & rate reduction arguments from your customer.

Learn more about reducing Warranty & Contract Leakage: 

 

ABOUT Coen Jeukens

Coen JeukensCoen Jeukens is VP of global customer transformation at ServiceMax. He works with customers and prospects to fully unlock the true value and potential of their service organizations. Prior to joining ServiceMax, Coen was the services contract director at Bosch where he implemented an outcome based business model, with highly impressive results. Coen is also a regular keynote speaker at prominent field service conferences around the globe.

ABOUT Kieran Notter

Kieran NotterKieran Notter is VP of Global Customer Transformation at ServiceMax. He is acknowledged as a service industry domain expert with 30 years’ experience. He specializes in field service revenue and working capital improvements, with a particular passion for supply chain operations. He is highly effective at partnering with customers to deliver tangible, practical results across their service operations. Having previously worked for companies including Kodak, Bell & Howell and, most recently, Pitney Bowes he understands the importance of a logical approach that is supported by real-time analytics. His considerable experience in implementing and using systems such as SAP, Servigistics (PTC), Oracle (Siebel), Salesforce and ServiceMax enables him to recognize a client’s challenges and facilitate solutions that lead to sustainable growth. His recent consultancy engagements have delivered improvements, such as reducing field service inventory levels by 45 percent while maintaining a higher first-time fix rate.