Mobile & Tech

Rugged Devices vs Smartphones? Perhaps Neither

Is a smartphone really the right tool for a dirty job?

That’s the big question that emerged from a LinkedIn group discussion on the use of rugged versus regular mobile devices in field service. Smartphones and rugged devices are certainly buzz words in the industry these days, but many pointed out they don’t always make sense for a gritty job.

For some kinds of work, a smartphone or even a ruggedized device is unlikely to last very long, argued Thomas Bodinean electrical systems engineer for Advanced Micro Devices in Austin, Texas. So why not just use cheaper “feature” phones and avoid costly repairs and replacements?

“Can ruggedized phones survive a fall from a 40-foot or 140-foot platform or be retrieved from the bottom of the sea and be useful? I think not,” Bodine wrote.

Others like Ian McLean, a tech at Sound Environments in Toronto, extolled the virtues (and the apps) of his Android-powered smartphone. “Basically most situations where I would need to lug around a laptop, I can simply pull out my phone,” he wrote. “I walk into many jobs with my phone, cutters and a screwdriver and can take care of most jobs,” he says.

Does your company still use feature phones, or have smartphones and tablets reshaped how you do your job? What’s the best mobile device for field service — or does the perfect device not yet exist? Let us know in the comments, or in the LinkedIn group.

More: Are Smartphones Tough Enough for the Field?

Click here to download a free whitepaper, “Five Steps to Make Field Service Profitable.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Want to run a better service organization?

Sign up to get the latest Field Service Digital news delivered to your inbox. 

Thanks for subscribing! Please add fsdigital[AT]original9.com to your contacts to make sure you get the latest field service news delivered to your inbox.